I Know AudiologyTwo Risks Most Audiology Practices Don't Realize They're Carrying.
The first is the referral gap. An audiologist is often the first clinician to encounter symptoms that aren't actually a hearing loss problem, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, asymmetrical loss, unilateral tinnitus, vestibular symptoms. These are red flags that warrant referral to an ENT or, in some cases, emergency evaluation. If the audiologist misses that signal and fitting or treatment proceeds instead, the resulting professional liability claim looks very different from a routine device complaint. It's the same dynamic we see in physical therapy with direct access, the clinician is carrying diagnostic responsibility that most people assume belongs to a physician.
The second is the product. Most healthcare professionals provide a service. Audiologists do that and they also sell expensive medical devices. That creates a products liability exposure that sits alongside the professional liability exposure, and the two don't always live cleanly in the same policy. Questions about improper fitting, programming errors, excessive amplification, or allegations that a device worsened a patient's condition can blur the line between a service claim and a product claim. Carriers handle those differently, and a policy that wasn't written with both in mind can leave gaps.
Then there's the staffing question, the same one that comes up in pharmacy and PT. Audiology assistants, externs, students, and independent contractors covering shifts all raise the same issue: who does the policy actually consider an insured when someone other than the practice owner is involved in a claim?